Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Open Relationship: Navigating the Grey Areas of Modern Non-Monogamy

Reading time: 11 minutes

Table of Contents

• Understanding DADT Relationships
• What Exactly Is a Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Arrangement?
• The Psychology Behind DADT
• Benefits and Challenges of DADT Relationships
• Real-Life DADT Scenarios
• Communication Strategies That Actually Work
• Alternative Non-Monogamous Arrangements
• Creating Sustainable DADT Dynamics
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Charting Your Relationship Path Forward

Understanding DADT Relationships

In the evolving landscape of modern relationships, the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (DADT) open relationship model has emerged as a complex arrangement that challenges traditional monogamy while maintaining certain psychological boundaries. Perhaps you’ve heard whispers about this approach, or maybe you’re actively considering it with your partner. Either way, you’re entering territory that requires nuance, self-awareness, and careful navigation.

DADT relationships sit at an interesting intersection of non-monogamy and emotional comfort zones. Unlike fully transparent open relationships where partners share details about their outside connections, DADT creates deliberate information barriers. It’s not about deception but rather about creating agreed-upon zones of privacy.

As Alex, a relationship coach I interviewed for this article, explains: “DADT arrangements often emerge when one or both partners are drawn to non-monogamy but find emotional comfort in maintaining certain informational boundaries. It’s not inherently problematic, but it requires exceptional emotional maturity and clear agreements.”

What Exactly Is a Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Arrangement?

A Don’t Ask Don’t Tell open relationship is an agreement where partners consent to non-monogamy with the understanding that they won’t share or request specific information about outside relationships or encounters. The core premise is simple: both partners agree to external connections while maintaining a “need-to-know” approach that limits disclosure.

Key Elements of DADT Relationships

While every DADT arrangement is unique, most share these fundamental characteristics:

• Mutual Consent: Both partners explicitly agree to the arrangement
• Established Boundaries: Clear rules about what activities are permitted
• Information Management: Agreements about what details remain private
• Health Protocols: Safety measures regarding sexual health
• Primary Relationship Primacy: The main partnership typically remains the priority

The DADT approach differs significantly from other non-monogamous arrangements in its approach to information sharing. While polyamory typically emphasizes transparency, and open relationships often include various levels of disclosure, DADT deliberately creates knowledge boundaries.

The Spectrum of Disclosure

It’s important to understand that DADT isn’t a binary arrangement but exists on a spectrum. Some couples might agree to basic acknowledgment without details (“I’m going out tonight with someone”), while others maintain complete separation (“What happens outside our relationship isn’t discussed at all”).

As Maya, who has been in a DADT relationship for three years, shared: “We have basic safety protocols—letting each other know where we’ll be and when we’ll be home—but the specifics of what happens remain private. It works for us because we both value our independence while maintaining our committed primary relationship.”

The Psychology Behind DADT

The psychological underpinnings of DADT relationships reveal interesting patterns in how humans balance intimacy, autonomy, and emotional security. Several psychological factors can draw people to this particular arrangement:

• Compartmentalization: The ability to separate different aspects of one’s emotional and sexual life
• Jealousy Management: Avoiding triggers for comparative thinking or jealousy
• Autonomy Needs: Desire for personal freedom within a committed relationship
• Cognitive Dissonance Reduction: Minimizing conflicts between monogamous ideals and non-monogamous desires

According to research by Dr. Terri Conley, a social psychologist studying non-monogamy, approximately 4-5% of Americans practice some form of consensual non-monogamy, with DADT arrangements comprising a significant subset. Her studies suggest that the success of these arrangements often correlates with participants’ communication skills and emotional self-regulation capabilities.

Benefits and Challenges of DADT Relationships

Like any relationship structure, DADT arrangements come with distinctive advantages and potential pitfalls. Understanding these can help you determine whether this approach aligns with your needs and capacities.

Potential Benefits

• Reduced Jealousy Triggers: Less information can mean fewer comparison opportunities
• Personal Autonomy: Creates space for independent experiences
• Maintains Fantasy Elements: Preserves certain romantic or sexual ideals
• Privacy Boundaries: Respects individual comfort with disclosure
• Relationship Longevity: Can help committed partners with differing needs stay together

Common Challenges

• Communication Difficulties: Determining what information is covered by “don’t tell”
• Unresolved Feelings: Emotions may build without processing outlets
• Trust Complications: Balancing privacy with honesty can be delicate
• Practical Logistics: Managing time, resources, and relationships discreetly
• Emotional Development Limitations: Might prevent growth through confronting difficult emotions

Real-Life DADT Scenarios

To better understand how DADT relationships function in practice, let’s look at two case studies that illustrate different approaches:

Case Study 1: Jamie and Alex

Jamie and Alex have been married for 12 years. After the first decade, they realized they had different sexual needs but a strong emotional bond and family life. They established a DADT arrangement with specific parameters:

• Outside connections must not impact family time
• No mutual friends or colleagues
• Regular STI testing
• Overnight absences are limited and planned in advance
• No discussion of specific encounters or partners

Alex shares: “It wasn’t easy at first. We spent six months just discussing boundaries before acting on anything. Three years in, we’ve found a balance that works. I don’t need to know the details of Jamie’s other relationships, but I feel secure knowing our marriage remains the priority for both of us.”

Case Study 2: Morgan and Taylor

Morgan and Taylor began their relationship as monogamous but opened it after two years when Morgan’s job required frequent travel. Their DADT arrangement operates differently:

• Both acknowledge when they’re seeing others but don’t share details
• They maintain a “home base” rule where certain intimate activities are exclusive
• They conduct quarterly “check-ins” about the arrangement itself
• Both agree to end outside relationships if they begin developing significant emotional attachment

Taylor notes: “The hardest part was defining what information fell under ‘don’t tell.’ We’ve had to refine our boundaries several times. For us, acknowledging that something is happening without discussing the specifics works best.”

Communication Strategies That Actually Work

The irony of DADT relationships is that they require exceptional communication about communication itself. Successful navigation depends on clearly established boundaries and regular meta-communication (talking about how you talk).

Establishing DADT Boundaries

Effective DADT relationships typically begin with thorough boundary discussions covering:

• Information boundaries: What specific details are off-limits?
• Activity boundaries: What actions are permitted or prohibited?
• Emotional boundaries: How are feelings for outside partners handled?
• Practical boundaries: How are time, resources, and spaces managed?
• Health boundaries: What safety protocols are required?

Dr. Elisabeth Sheff, author of “The Polyamorists Next Door,” suggests starting with a comprehensive boundary-setting exercise: “Partners should independently write down their ideal boundaries, then compare notes. Areas of disagreement become the focus of negotiation until consensus is reached.”

Navigating the Grey Areas

Even with clear boundaries, ambiguous situations inevitably arise. Developing protocols for handling these moments can prevent significant relationship disruption:

• Create a “boundary question” protocol: Establish how partners can clarify uncertain boundaries without violating the DADT agreement
• Regular arrangement check-ins: Schedule periodic discussions about the arrangement itself, separate from specific activities
• Emotional temperature readings: Develop methods to signal when someone is struggling without detailing why

One effective approach comes from relationship therapist Esther Perel, who recommends “containment conversations” where partners can discuss the structure of their arrangement without delving into specifics of outside relationships.

Alternative Non-Monogamous Arrangements

DADT represents just one approach on the non-monogamy spectrum. Understanding alternatives can help you determine if DADT truly aligns with your needs or if another model might better serve your relationship.

Transparent Open Relationships

Unlike DADT, transparent open relationships emphasize honest disclosure about outside connections. Partners typically share varying levels of information about their experiences, from basic acknowledgment to detailed accounts. This approach prioritizes processing emotions together and using transparency as a trust-building mechanism.

The key difference: Partners actively discuss outside relationships rather than compartmentalizing them.

Kitchen Table Polyamory

This polyamorous approach envisions a network where all partners know each other and can comfortably gather around the metaphorical kitchen table. It emphasizes integration rather than separation, with relationships between metamours (your partner’s other partners) encouraged.

The key difference: Outside relationships are fully acknowledged and integrated into the relationship network.

Monogamish Arrangements

Coined by relationship columnist Dan Savage, “monogamish” describes primarily monogamous relationships with occasional, agreed-upon exceptions. These might include specific circumstances like travel, certain individuals, or particular events.

The key difference: Non-monogamous activities are exceptions rather than ongoing arrangements.

Creating Sustainable DADT Dynamics

If you’ve determined that DADT aligns with your relationship needs, how can you maximize your chances of success? Research and clinical experience suggest several key practices:

Essential Practices

1. Begin with comprehensive agreements: Document boundaries explicitly
2. Establish health protocols: Regular testing and safer sex practices are non-negotiable
3. Create emergency communication channels: Determine how to handle situations that might require breaking the “don’t tell” boundary
4. Build individual emotional processing skills: Since you’ll be handling many feelings independently, strengthen your emotional regulation capabilities
5. Schedule regular arrangement check-ins: Review how the structure itself is working without discussing specific encounters

Dr. Liz Powell, psychologist and author of “Building Open Relationships,” emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the arrangement and its implementation: “Regularly ask, ‘Is our DADT agreement itself working?’ This is different from ‘Are the specific activities happening within this agreement working?’ The former can be discussed without violating DADT boundaries.”

Warning Signs and Red Flags

Be alert to these indicators that your DADT arrangement may need adjustment:

• Increasing anxiety or insecurity about unknown activities
• Pattern of “accidentally” discovering information
• Declining intimacy or connection in the primary relationship
• Difficulty maintaining established boundaries
• One partner pushing for more information while the other reinforces barriers

These signs don’t necessarily mean DADT isn’t right for you, but they indicate the current implementation requires refinement. Consider seeking professional guidance from a therapist experienced with non-monogamous relationships if these patterns emerge.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a Don’t Ask Don’t Tell relationship ethical?

Yes, DADT relationships can be ethical when they involve informed consent from all parties and clear boundaries. The ethical foundation rests on whether the arrangement is freely chosen rather than coerced, whether agreements are honored, and whether all parties (including outside partners) understand the nature of the relationship. The key ethical consideration is that privacy differs from deception—partners agree to certain information boundaries rather than engaging in secret behavior.

How do we handle accidentally discovering information that falls under our “don’t tell” agreement?

When information breaches occur, acknowledge it directly but briefly. For example: “I inadvertently discovered something that falls under our agreement. I’m working through my feelings about it independently, but I wanted you to know about the breach.” Avoid discussing the specific information or using it in arguments. Some couples find it helpful to have an agreed-upon protocol for information breaches, such as a cooling-off period before discussing the boundary violation itself (not the specific information).

Can DADT relationships work long-term?

Research on non-monogamous relationships suggests that DADT arrangements can be sustainable when they align with both partners’ authentic needs and communication styles. The key factors for longevity include regular meta-communication about the arrangement itself, strong individual emotional processing skills, and flexibility to adjust boundaries as the relationship evolves. According to a 2020 study in the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, the stability of non-monogamous arrangements correlates more strongly with communication quality than with the specific structure chosen.

Charting Your Relationship Path Forward

Whether you’re considering, beginning, or currently navigating a DADT relationship, remember that relationship structures are tools to serve human connection—not rigid frameworks that people must conform to. The success of any arrangement depends less on following prescribed rules and more on how well it aligns with your authentic needs, values, and communication patterns.

As you explore this relationship model, consider these guiding principles:

• Prioritize authenticity over conforming to external relationship ideals
• Develop self-awareness about your emotional responses and needs
• Commit to ongoing consent conversations as needs and circumstances evolve
• Build individual emotional resilience alongside relationship skills
• Remember that relationship structures should serve connection, not the other way around

The most successful non-monogamous relationships—regardless of their specific structure—share a foundation of mutual respect, ongoing consent, and commitment to each partner’s wellbeing. DADT arrangements add complexity through information management, requiring exceptional clarity about boundaries and exceptional diligence in honoring them.

What matters most isn’t whether your relationship matches external models but whether it creates the conditions for both partners to thrive. What would a relationship structure that truly honors both your needs for security and exploration look like? The answer to that question will guide your path forward more effectively than any prescriptive model.

How might you begin the conversation about relationship structure in a way that invites honest, non-judgmental exploration of each partner’s authentic needs?